@article {3303,
	title = {The GAGE Data and Field Response to the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence},
	journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
	year = {2020},
	month = {03},
	abstract = {The July 2019 Ridgecrest sequence was observed in exquisite detail by the National Science Foundation{\textquoteright}s (NSF) Geodetic Facility for the Advancement of Geoscience (GAGE) Network of the Americas (NOTA), which has a dense array of continuously observing Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) stations and subarrays of strain and seismic borehole networks in southern California. Two hundred and eighteen GNSS and 10 borehole NOTA stations within 250~km of the epicentral area recorded the sequence. Special downloads of high-rate data from sites within a specified radius of each earthquake were initiated by the GAGE Facility for the time period of 1.5 days before and 1.5 days after each event to ensure transient deformation was captured at a high-temporal resolution. Rapid field deployments of temporary GNSS stations were carried out by UNAVCO in support of NSF-funded investigators and U.S. Geological Survey activities. The data recorded by the permanent network are available from the GAGE Facility{\textquoteright}s Data Center at UNAVCO, data recorded at the temporary campaign sites will also be made available on completion of data collection. The OpenTopography project, of which UNAVCO is a partner, released a preliminary pre-event digital surface model of the area covering the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence to support the ongoing imaging efforts to measure the deformation from these events. In this article, we document the significant amount of detailed, open-access geodetic data available from GAGE to study this sequence and advance our understanding of earthquake processes, the geodynamics of the California eastern shear zone, and our capacity to respond to damaging earthquakes for research.},
	issn = {0895-0695},
	doi = {10.1785/0220190283},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190283},
	author = {Mattioli, Glen S. and Phillips, David A. and Hodgkinson, Kathleen M. and Walls, Chris and Mencin, David J. and Bartel, Beth A. and Charlevoix, Donna J. and Crosby, Chris and Gottlieb, Michael J. and Henderson, Brent and Johnson, Wade and Maggert, David and Mann, Doerte and Meertens, Charles M. and Normandeau, Jim and Pettit, Joe and Puskas, Christine M. and Rowan, Linda and Sievers, Charles and Zaino, Annie}
}
@article {3399,
	title = {Measuring success for a future vision: Defining impact in science gateways/virtual research environments},
	journal = {Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience},
	volume = {n/a},
	year = {2020},
	abstract = {Summary Scholars worldwide leverage science gateways/virtual research environments (VREs) for a wide variety of research and education endeavors spanning diverse scientific fields. Evaluating the value of a given science gateway/VRE to its constituent community is critical in obtaining the financial and human resources necessary to sustain operations and increase adoption in the user community. In this article, we feature a variety of exemplar science gateways/VREs and detail how they define impact in terms of, for example, their purpose, operation principles, and size of user base. Further, the exemplars recognize that their science gateways/VREs will continuously evolve with technological advancements and standards in cloud computing platforms, web service architectures, data management tools and cybersecurity. Correspondingly, we present a number of technology advances that could be incorporated in next-generation science gateways/VREs to enhance their scope and scale of their operations for greater success/impact. The exemplars are selected from owners of science gateways in the Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI) clientele in the United States, and from the owners of VREs in the International Virtual Research Environment Interest Group (VRE-IG) of the Research Data Alliance. Thus, community-driven best practices and technology advances are compiled from diverse expert groups with an international perspective to envisage futuristic science gateway/VRE innovations.},
	keywords = {futuristic vision, measuring impact, science gateways, success metrics, virtual research environments},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6099},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cpe.6099},
	author = {Calyam, Prasad and Wilkins-Diehr, Nancy and Miller, Mark and Brookes, Emre H. and Arora, Ritu and Chourasia, Amit and Jennewein, Douglas M. and Nandigam, Viswanath and Drew LaMar, M. and Cleveland, Sean B. and Newman, Greg and Wang, Shaowen and Zaslavsky, Ilya and Cianfrocco, Michael A. and Ellett, Kevin and Tarboton, David and Jeffery, Keith G. and Zhao, Zhiming and Gonz{\'a}lez-Aranda, Juan and Perri, Mark J. and Tucker, Greg and Candela, Leonardo and Kiss, Tamas and Gesing, Sandra}
}
@article {3354,
	title = {Emergent Challenges for Science sUAS Data Management: Fairness through Community Engagement and Best Practices Development},
	journal = {Remote Sensing},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2019},
	month = {jul},
	pages = {1797},
	doi = {10.3390/rs11151797},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.3390\%2Frs11151797},
	author = {Jane Wyngaard and Lindsay Barbieri and Andrea Thomer and Josip Adams and Don Sullivan and Christopher Crosby and Cynthia Parr and Jens Klump and Sudhir Raj Shrestha and Tom Bell}
}
@article {3329,
	title = {Measuring Success: How Science Gateways Define Impact},
	journal = {Proceedings of Gateways 2019},
	year = {2019},
	month = {Sep},
	url = {http://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10116256},
	author = {Wilkins-Diehr, Nancy and Miller, Mark and Brookes, Emre H and Arora, Ritu and Chourasia, Amit and Calyam, Prasad and Jennewein, Douglas M and Nandigam, Viswanath and LaMar, M Drew and Cleveland, Sean B and et al.}
}
@article {3262,
	title = {Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: A review},
	journal = {Earth-Science Reviews},
	volume = {148},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {174 - 193},
	keywords = {Bathymetry, Change detection, Filtering, Geomorphic features, IfSAR, InSAR, LIDAR, Point cloud, Structure from Motion},
	issn = {0012-8252},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.012},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825215300015},
	author = {Paola Passalacqua and Patrick Belmont and Dennis M. Staley and Jeffrey D. Simley and J Ram{\'o}n Arrowsmith and Collin A. Bode and Christopher Crosby and Stephen B. DeLong and Nancy F. Glenn and Sara A. Kelly and Dimitri Lague and Harish Sangireddy and Keelin Schaffrath and David G. Tarboton and Thad Wasklewicz and Joseph M. Wheaton}
}
@article {3261,
	title = {Laser vision: lidar as a transformative tool to advance critical zone science},
	journal = {Hydrology and Earth System Sciences},
	volume = {19},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {2881{\textendash}2897},
	doi = {10.5194/hess-19-2881-2015},
	url = {https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/2881/2015/},
	author = {Harpold, A. A. and Marshall, J. A. and Lyon, S. W. and Barnhart, T. B. and Fisher, B. A. and Donovan, M. and Brubaker, K. M. and Crosby, C. J. and Glenn, N. F. and Glennie, C. L. and Kirchner, P. B. and Lam, N. and Mankoff, K. D. and McCreight, J. L. and Molotch, N. P. and Musselman, K. N. and Pelletier, J. and Russo, T. and Sangireddy, H. and Sj{\"o}berg, Y. and Swetnam, T. and West, N.}
}
@proceedings {3087,
	title = {Leveraging XSEDE HPC resources to address computational challenges with high-resolution topography data},
	year = {2014},
	address = {Atlanta, GA},
	url = {http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2616498.2616564},
	author = {Choonhan Youn and Viswanath Nandigam and Minh Phan and David Tarboton and Nancy Wilkins-Diehr and Chaitan Baru and Christopher J Crosby and Anand Padmanabhan and Shaowen Wang}
}
@article {3090,
	title = {CyberGIS software: a synthetic review and integration roadmap},
	journal = {International Journal of Geographical Information Science},
	volume = {27},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {2122-2145},
	doi = {10.1080/13658816.2013.776049},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.776049},
	author = {Shaowen Wang and Luc Anselin and Budhendra Bhaduri and Christopher J Crosby and Michael F. Goodchild and Yan Liu and Timothy L. Nyerges}
}
@conference {3088,
	title = {Integration of Science Gateways: A Case Study with CyberGIS and OpenTopography},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the Conference on Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment: Gateway to Discovery},
	year = {2013},
	publisher = {ACM},
	organization = {ACM},
	address = {New York, NY, USA},
	keywords = {CyberGIS, integration, OpenTopography, science gateway},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-2170-9},
	doi = {10.1145/2484762.2484808},
	url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2484762.2484808},
	author = {Anand Padmanabhan and Choonhan Youn and Hwang, Myunghwa and Liu, Yan and Wang, Shaowen and Nancy Wilkins-Diehr and Christopher J Crosby}
}
@article {3096,
	title = {Illuminating Northern California{\textquoteright}s Active Faults},
	journal = {Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union},
	volume = {90},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {55{\textendash}55},
	keywords = {active faults, Continental margins: transform, General or miscellaneous, GEON OpenTopography Portal, LIDAR, North America, Paleoseismology, Tectonics and landscape evolution},
	issn = {2324-9250},
	doi = {10.1029/2009EO070002},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009EO070002},
	author = {Prentice, Carol S. and Christopher J Crosby and Whitehill, Caroline S. and Ram{\'o}n J Arrowsmith and Furlong, Kevin P. and Phillips, David A.}
}
